When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

Abstract In Social Work research there is a strong debate on the distinctiveness and methodological quality, how to address dilemma of rigour practice relevance. Given nature field has developed characteristic culture that puts emphasis giving voice service users disseminating knowledge in practice, especially stream so called practice-based research. However, no consensus best contribute through at same time producing rigourous scientific outcomes, resulting pluralism. Studying perceptions researchers their role, aims values approach, provides insight into pluralism Thirty-four professors specialising participated Q methodology study. combines qualitative quantitative methods. It helped reveal describe divergent views as well consensus. The analysis led identification three differing viewpoints research, which have been given following denominators: Substantiator, Change Agent Enlightener. provide with framework they can position themselves Researchers state are helpful clarifying perspectives good facilitate discourse choices further develop strengthen discipline.